Circles quiz
By Ralph Waldo Emerson
A philosopher dares you to draw a larger circle around every truth you think you know
20 questions · about 21 minutes
Questions and answers
-
Question 1. Which literary and philosophical movement does "Circles" exemplify?
- Correct answer: Transcendentalism
- Enlightenment Rationalism
- Realism
- Romanticism
- Naturalism
Transcendentalism holds that the individual soul is divine, truth is ever-expanding, and no institution or dogma is final — exactly what Emerson argues throughout this essay.
Read the passage -
Question 2. What is the central argument of "Circles"?
- Human beings should seek stability and permanence, since a settled mind is necessary for happiness
- The natural world follows fixed laws that the human intellect can fully discover and classify
- Correct answer: Every achievement and truth is merely the starting point for a still larger one
- True wisdom comes from studying the ancient Greeks and Romans rather than modern writers
Emerson’s central argument is that "around every circle another can be drawn" — no truth, institution, or achievement is final. Every end is a beginning, and growth depends on the willingness to abandon what we have already reached.
Read the passage -
Question 3. What does the circle symbolize throughout the essay?
- The eternal cycle of birth, death, and rebirth that returns all living things to the start
- The perfection of ancient Greek art and geometry, which later ages can only copy
- The closed, self-sufficient nature of the individual soul, sealed off from society
- Correct answer: Any settled truth or achievement that a larger perspective will eventually surround and supersede
The circle is Emerson’s central metaphor for any settled truth, institution, or achievement. Every circle can be drawn around by a larger one, showing that no position is final. "The life of man is a self-evolving circle, which, from a ring imperceptibly small, rushes on all sides outwards to new and larger circles, and that without end."
Read the passage -
Question 4. How does Saint Augustine describe the nature of God at the opening of the essay?
- A straight line extending from creation to eternity without deviation
- Correct answer: A circle whose centre is everywhere and its circumference nowhere
- A sphere of infinite radius encompassing all creation within it
- A point of perfect stillness from which all motion originates
Emerson opens by quoting Saint Augustine: God is "a circle whose centre was everywhere, and its circumference nowhere" — establishing the circle as both a divine and philosophical emblem from the essay’s first paragraph.
Read the passage -
Question 5. After calling himself an experimenter who unsettles everything, what does Emerson say stays fixed in "Circles"?
- Nothing at all, since every truth and every law will someday be replaced by a larger one
- Correct answer: A central life in the soul that draws every circle and abides while the circles change
- The moral rules of society, which must stay firm so that all other change can be safe
- The great works of the past, which he says outlast every new idea that comes after them
Emerson answers his own skeptic. He says all this movement could never be felt "but by contrast to some principle of fixture or stability in the soul," and then: "Whilst the eternal generation of circles proceeds, the eternal generator abides." The circles keep changing; the power that draws them does not. That is what keeps the essay from becoming the indifference to all actions his imagined reader accuses him of.
Read the passage -
Question 6. What does Emerson mean when he writes "The universe is fluid and volatile"?
- Correct answer: Nothing in the universe is permanent — every fact, institution, or truth will eventually be dissolved and replaced by something larger
- The physical universe is made of liquids and gases in constant chemical reaction, so that no solid material remains permanently stable
- Human moods are unstable and cannot be trusted as a guide to truth, since the thoughts of today will seem strange a month from now
- Ancient civilizations like Greece dissolved because their cultures lacked a strong moral foundation to hold their cities and institutions together
Emerson uses "fluid and volatile" to argue that permanence is an illusion. "There are no fixtures in nature." What appears stable — empires, religions, sciences — is only temporarily so; every settled fact will eventually be superseded by a new idea or generalization.
Read the passage -
Question 7. What does Emerson mean by "People wish to be settled; only as far as they are unsettled is there any hope for them"?
- Political instability is a necessary precondition for social progress and reform
- People who are content with their circumstances will never feel the need to improve themselves
- People who move frequently are more creative than those who stay in one place
- Correct answer: The desire for certainty and stability actually blocks the growth the soul requires to thrive
Emerson argues that growth requires disturbance. The soul that clings to settled beliefs, institutions, or positions has stopped expanding. To be truly alive is to remain open to being overturned by a larger truth. Settlement is spiritual stagnation; unsettlement is the condition of hope.
Read the passage -
Question 8. Emerson describes "conversation" using the same metaphor as the essay’s title. What does he say conversation does?
- It builds consensus by drawing every speaker toward a common center of agreement
- It traps the speakers inside their own prejudices, forming a closed circle of settled thought
- Correct answer: It is a game of circles in which each new speaker draws a larger circle around the last
- It reveals the hidden limitations of the speakers more clearly than their true ideas or beliefs
Emerson writes: "Conversation is a game of circles." Each new speaker "strikes a new light, emancipates us from the oppression of the last speaker" before yielding us to another. Conversation enacts the same expansive pattern as the essay’s central metaphor.
Read the passage -
Question 9. According to Emerson, what is "the only sin"?
- Selfishness and the pursuit of pleasure at the expense of the common good
- Correct answer: Limitation — the failure to keep expanding beyond one’s current circle
- Pride and the refusal to acknowledge one’s own ignorance before others
- Violence against the social order and the institutions that protect it
Emerson writes: "The only sin is limitation." Once you discover a person’s limits, he says, "it is all over with him." Growth is moral; stagnation is sin. This statement links Emerson’s metaphysics of circles directly to his ethics of self-transcendence.
Read the passage -
Question 10. What does Emerson mean when he writes "Beware when the great God lets loose a thinker on this planet"?
- Correct answer: A truly original thinker destabilizes every settled truth and institution, like a city-wide fire where nothing is safe
- Great thinkers are chosen by God and must be approached with caution, respect, and humility
- Philosophers are dangerous because they undermine religious faith and the social order that protects a nation
- God punishes a civilization by sending disruptive thinkers whenever its people become too proud and complacent
Emerson compares the arrival of a great original thinker to a city-wide fire: "There is not a piece of science, but its flank may be turned to-morrow; there is not any literary reputation... that may not be revised and condemned." He celebrates this destabilization rather than fearing it — it is the universe’s expanding circle in action.
Read the passage -
Question 11. Who does Emerson quote at the essay’s climax with the line, "A man never rises so high as when he knows not whither he is going"?
- Napoleon Bonaparte
- George Washington
- Julius Caesar
- Correct answer: Oliver Cromwell
Emerson quotes Oliver Cromwell near the essay’s close to illustrate the power of abandonment and enthusiasm. The line supports his argument that the greatest achievements come not from careful planning but from throwing oneself forward into the unknown.
Read the passage -
Question 12. What does Emerson mean when he writes "There is no virtue which is final; all are initial"?
- Young people are more virtuous than older people because they have not yet developed any bad habits or vices
- Correct answer: What counts as virtue today will itself be surpassed and redefined by a higher standard tomorrow
- Virtue is only possible for individuals who have first mastered the basics of moral behavior
- The virtues of the saint are not available to ordinary people living in society, who must accept inferior ones
Emerson applies the circle metaphor to ethics: even our current virtues are only the first circle, destined to be drawn around by a larger one. "The virtues of society are vices of the saint." What seems like the highest moral achievement now is only a stepping stone to a greater one.
Read the passage -
Question 13. What does "Hodiernal" mean in this story?
- Relating to eternal or timeless truths beyond history
- Characteristic of a deeply old or ancient way of thinking
- Correct answer: Of or belonging to the present day; current
- Derived from careful observation of the natural world
Emerson writes: "Literature is a point outside of our hodiernal circle" — meaning our current, day-to-day perspective. He argues that literature offers a vantage point outside our present circle, allowing us to see it more clearly. "Hodiernal" comes from the Latin "hodie" (today).
Read the passage -
Question 14. Which literary device is most central to the structure of "Circles"?
- Allegory, in which abstract figures such as Virtue and Sin act out a story with a hidden moral meaning
- Correct answer: Extended metaphor, in which the circle organizes and drives the entire philosophical argument
- Dramatic irony, in which the reader understands something about the essay that the narrator does not
- Stream of consciousness, in which thoughts flow freely without logical organization or structure
Emerson builds the entire essay on a single extended metaphor: the circle. Every argument — about truth, virtue, conversation, literature, and the soul — is expressed as a variation on the circle expanding outward. The FAQ confirms that Emerson also uses paradox ("every action admits of being outdone") and anaphora to reinforce the argument.
Read the passage -
Question 15. Which of the following best illustrates Emerson’s use of paradox in the essay?
- Correct answer: "The highest prudence is the lowest prudence" — our safest strategy is to abandon caution entirely
- The eye is the first circle; the horizon it forms is the second, repeated through nature
- The life of man is a self-evolving circle rushing outward to new and larger circles
- The universe is fluid and volatile; permanence is but a word of degrees in nature
Emerson’s statement "I suppose that the highest prudence is the lowest prudence" is a classic paradox: the very act of being too cautious makes you more vulnerable, not less. It flips a conventional value (prudence = safety) on its head to show that the circle of ordinary wisdom has limits a bolder perspective can surround.
Read the passage -
Question 16. What does Emerson argue is "the only disease" in the essay?
- Ignorance — the failure to study history and learn from the great achievements of the past
- Vanity — the hunger for praise and approbation, which makes us dependent on the opinion of friends
- Conformity — the surrender of individual judgment to social convention and peer pressure
- Correct answer: Old age — the refusal to grow, which manifests as conservatism, inertia, and the acceptance of limits
Emerson writes: "Nature abhors the old, and old age seems the only disease; all others run into this one." He is not speaking literally about biological aging but about the mindset of conservatism and stagnation — fever, intemperance, insanity, stupidity, and crime are all "forms of old age" because they are forms of rest and inertia rather than growth.
Read the passage -
Question 17. What does "Pyrrhonism" mean in this story?
- The belief that moral truth can only be found through direct experience of nature
- An ancient Greek school of thought that placed reason above all forms of religious belief
- Correct answer: Radical skepticism in which all beliefs are treated as equally uncertain and undecidable
- A philosophical position that every action produces an equal and opposite reaction
Near the essay’s end, an imagined critic accuses Emerson: "you have arrived at a fine Pyrrhonism, at an equivalence and indifferency of all actions." Pyrrhonism is radical skepticism — the view that nothing can be known for certain. Emerson accepts the charge playfully: "I unsettle all things. No facts are to me sacred; none are profane; I simply experiment, an endless seeker, with no Past at my back."
Read the passage -
Question 18. How does "Circles" relate to Emerson’s earlier essay "Self-Reliance"?
- Correct answer: "Circles" provides the philosophical foundation for self-reliance by explaining why no external authority or past truth can be final
- "Circles" directly contradicts "Self-Reliance" by arguing that the individual soul must eventually submit to a higher collective wisdom
- "Circles" is simply a restatement of "Self-Reliance" using a different metaphor but making the same argument
- "Circles" focuses on society while "Self-Reliance" focuses on the individual, making them complementary but unrelated essays
FAQ data confirms: "Circles" extends "Self-Reliance" by providing its philosophical justification. Self-Reliance demands that we trust our own thoughts even when they contradict our past positions. "Circles" explains why: because truth itself is not fixed but ever-expanding. The "foolish consistency" condemned in "Self-Reliance" is foolish precisely because every truth is destined to be superseded by a larger one.
Read the passage -
Question 19. Which of these events actually happened in the story?
-
Emerson opens the essay with the observation that the eye and the horizon form two circles.
Happened
Emerson begins: "The eye is the first circle; the horizon which it forms is the second" — establishing the essay’s central metaphor in its first sentence.
-
Emerson argues that permanence is the highest value the soul can attain.
Didn't happen
The opposite: Emerson declares "Permanence is but a word of degrees" and argues that growth requires the abandonment of any permanent position.
-
Emerson cites Saint Augustine’s description of God as a circle whose center is everywhere.
Happened
In the opening paragraph, Emerson writes: "St. Augustine described the nature of God as a circle whose centre was everywhere, and its circumference nowhere."
-
Emerson states that "the only sin is limitation."
Happened
Emerson writes: "Men cease to interest us when we find their limitations. The only sin is limitation." This is one of the essay’s most quoted lines.
-
Emerson argues that old friendships should be preserved above all else because they define who we are.
Didn't happen
Emerson argues the opposite: "A man’s growth is seen in the successive choirs of his friends. For every friend whom he loses for truth, he gains a better." No relationship is exempt from the law of expansion.
-
Emerson warns that a great original thinker is as dangerous to settled truths as a fire in a great city.
Happened
Emerson writes: "Beware when the great God lets loose a thinker on this planet. Then all things are at risk. It is as when a conflagration has broken out in a great city, and no man knows what is safe, or where it will end."
-
Emerson argues that science has now achieved a complete and final understanding of nature.
Didn't happen
Emerson explicitly denies this: "There is not a piece of science, but its flank may be turned to-morrow." No branch of knowledge is exempt from being superseded.
-
Emerson concludes that "Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm."
Happened
This is one of Emerson’s most famous lines and appears near the essay’s close, linking the argument about circles to the power of abandonment and enthusiasm.
-
Emerson says the natural world may be conceived as a system of concentric circles.
Happened
Emerson writes: "The natural world may be conceived of as a system of concentric circles" — showing that the circle metaphor applies to nature itself, not only to ideas and institutions.
-
Emerson describes himself as a settled thinker with a firm doctrine he wants readers to follow.
Didn't happen
Emerson explicitly refuses this role: "Do not set the least value on what I do, or the least discredit on what I do not, as if I pretended to settle any thing as true or false. I unsettle all things... I simply experiment, an endless seeker, with no Past at my back."
-
-
Question 20. How does Emerson end the essay, and what does the ending suggest about how we should live?
- With a call to study philosophy and history carefully before acting, so that readers avoid the mistakes of earlier generations
- With a warning against dreams, drunkenness, and wild passions, urging readers to maintain calm and sober self-control at every moment
- Correct answer: With a call to enthusiasm and abandonment, arguing that the greatest achievements require throwing oneself forward without knowing where one is going
- With a prayer for divine guidance, suggesting that no human effort is meaningful without God’s direction and the authority of the church
Emerson closes with his most electrifying claim: "Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm. The way of life is wonderful: it is by abandonment." He quotes Cromwell — "A man never rises so high as when he knows not whither he is going" — to argue that the willingness to draw a new circle, without guarantees, is the only true path to greatness.
Read the passage
Play it live with your class.
Put the code on the screen and students join on whatever they have.